HomeВидеоигрыRelated VideosMore From: Testing Games

i5 9600k vs Ryzen 5 2600x Test in 9 Games

894 ratings | 62080 views
Intel Core i5-9600k vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600x (RTX 2080) Games : The Witcher 3 Assassin's Creed Odyssey - 01:22 Battlefield 1 - 02:33 Project Cars - 03:55 Fallout 4 - 05:33 Grand Theft Auto V - 06:49 Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 07:38 Far Cry 5 - 09:04 Assassin's Creed Origins - 10:11 System: Windows 10 Pro Intel i5 9600k 3.7Ghz Asus ROG Strix Z390-F Gaming AMD Ryzen 5 2600x 3.6Ghz Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING GeForce RTX 2080 OC 8Gb 16Gb RAM 3200Mhz
Category: Видеоигры
Html code for embedding videos on your blog
Text Comments (526)
Vovical (6 hours ago)
Intel - Pure Gaming, better FPS but kind of overpriced AMD - Gaming + Literally anything else, worse FPS but much more reasonable price I myself will be going with an Intel 9600K for more FPS, even though it is kind of overpriced, and intel is greedy as fuck
Panagiotis Rafailidis (3 days ago)
look the cpu usage on intel its double all the time where the 2600 is chill af axaxxaxaxxaxaxaxax poor intel
Mark (5 days ago)
what CPU cooler did you used for Ryzen in this test?
Gioele (7 days ago)
Intel for cpu amd for Gpu
Woe (8 days ago)
"Look at the usage though" bruh what other program uses the 50% cpu left over? and if the usage matters so much then why isn't ryzen at 100%??? your telling me that the cpu not using its full potential is good? and I love ryzen, i am using a r3 1300x and an rx580 right now but jesus christ you dumbasses in these comment sections hurts my brain
Archangel17 (2 days ago)
Clearly these people are talking about the fact that now most games are still optimised for lower core/thread counts, which explains the more threads with amd doing more poorly for gaming (but great for cpu usage). This is probably caused by the fact that intel hasn't gone past 4 cores/8 threads for years for normal cpu's, so why would game developers optimalise the usage of more threads/cores. Now that amd is pushing the Cpu market with more cores/threads cpu's, future games might be developed to use more threads, and thus becoming more efficient for amd high core count cpu's. The 50% usage now, might be 75% in a few years for all we know, while the i5 obviously can't increase much past the 80-100% it now seems to already get.
Daalio (11 days ago)
well this is 180 euros vs 310 euros battle in my country, actualy for the price of 9600k i can get 2700x ryzen with good stock rgb cooler
Rainer (14 days ago)
intel is not bad, i just fucking hate that with intel i have to buy a cooler and a motherboard that is more expensive and wont matter for future cpus
htg97 (15 days ago)
intel's 9600k ~ amd's 2700x for gaming
Vaclav Rada (18 days ago)
I like how everyone is complaining about 110 vs 130 FPS while having 60 Hz monitor and not considering $200 vs $260 price... Edit: Ryzen 5 2600 = $160
madalici madalici (19 days ago)
As the i5 9600k manages to get more fps than rizen 5 2600x, I think it has a higher performance. Worse more because it gets more performance. It's normal!
Spirit Bond (21 days ago)
In my country i5 9600k is 80 euros more than 2600x and 130 euros more than 2600 :X
Crazycauses 51 (22 days ago)
I think the i5 9600k is one of Intel's best cpu to be honest.
Abdulhamid Saraçoğlu (24 days ago)
İntel işlemci kullanımı yüksek ama Amd düşük neden?
turbofanlover (24 days ago)
If one is predominantly a gamer, the i5 is still the better option, IMO. That said...it will be veeeery interesting to see if Zen 2 can finally change my mind on that. I would not be at all surprised if that will be the case. Stay tuned.
Shawn Minor (26 days ago)
That 20 series isn't that great
Мурзик (28 days ago)
Ты сравниваешь микропроцессоры либо ВИДЕОКАРТУ?
Stijn Weijters (28 days ago)
higher mhz ram and better oc optimzation and it will beat intel in every way except maybe for wattage.
Ahmad Chudary (29 days ago)
What cooler did u use ?
futmut1000 (1 month ago)
Poor AMD tardboys, no one talking about the result, all desperately trying to defend this pathetic Amd Cpu...Buh buh buh in 20 years it will beat this six core from intel since games will start using more threads, buh buh buh less cpu utilization, buh buh buh without fps counter they are the same...All lame excuses to defend this crap of a Cpu ;)
Argo Mium (8 hours ago)
The Ryzen CPUs are cheaper, offer good gaming performance and offer more logical cores. Paying 265$ + 35$ for a CPU + cooler combo is not worth the 20-30 fps for alot of people, especially when there are the R5 2600 and 2600x at 165$ and 230$ respectively. The Ryzen 2600/2600x are slower CPUs for a better price and offers good gaming performance and good multi threaded performance.
AndyPandy33 (1 month ago)
For some reason with intel CPU both CPU and GPU are at much higher load % than the combo with AMD CPU. This could mean that most games are tuned for intel while AMD doesn't have that privilege.
Крыс Аут (1 month ago)
14 499 руб. VS 22299 руб. DNS 22.12.18
Divinity divaviki (1 month ago)
Resume: INTEL 144HZ and AMD 60HZ
Leznox (28 days ago)
I use AMD CPU in 240hz and that work perfectly, goodbye and have a nice day !
Daevster 666 (1 month ago)
So I started to crunch some numbers and ya I have no choice but to go with AMD. The ryzen 5 2600 (non x) is $140 rn while the i5 9xxx is 270. That's a $120 dollar difference?!?!? Plus I'd need a cooler cause I don't think the i5 comes with one. So with a basic $30 cooler the Intel platform is $160 more expensive, yet I'm looking at the performance and there isn't a huge difference, there isn't a single game I wouldn't be able to play on an AMD rig. Sure the Intel configuration is like 15-30 more frames but considering I don't plan on gaming above 60 I should be fine. I really like my i5 2400 but intel was so cheap when I bought mine ($175). I guess Intel doesn't want to appeal to the average Joe anymore. Oh well, sigh now I need to just stay patient because I heard that soon ryzen 3xxx will come out and I've been told that the ryzen 3 3300 will be a 6core 12thread CPU for $99. That's crazy, I'd love to save $50 if I just wait a while.
Daevster 666 (1 month ago)
+Keelan Ya I noticed that, my i5 2400 is beginning to choke on games, I would oc it but its locked and the majority of AMD processors at the moment are unlocked.
Keelan (1 month ago)
Intel motherboards are more expensive also, its way too expensive for a 6 threaded cpu. Look at the cpu usage on the 9600k, it nearly maxes out on some games so in 2-3 years I cant see it doing well. I had a 2500k in 2011 but the difference there was that it only used about 30-40% usage on the games of the time like battlefield 3 so you didnt really need hyperthreading, now its madness to buy a cpu without hyperthreading imo. for the long run its worth it. with the 9600k you'll be replacing it with a 9700k or higher in a couple years and if you want a newer cpu you'll need a new motherboard aswell, whereas on amd you can just slot in the 4700x or w/e
ITSATRAP ! (1 month ago)
$800 gpu to test on 1080p and then you have these 12 year old intel fangirls screaming "amd blows"!
ITSATRAP ! (17 days ago)
+kenneth payne ohhhhhh the fan girl shows up
kenneth payne (18 days ago)
You've never heard of gaming at 144 mhz obviously.
Artem Tyftyakov (1 month ago)
Intel 100% 2600x 70%
dubol07 (1 month ago)
Stop lying it did not stick at 70%. It fluctuated between 75 - 86 percent. And at that usage, it ran at less FPS and heated up almost as much as intel. This means for ryzen to equal intel's FPS, its temperatures would rise significantly.
Dribbler1 (1 month ago)
I have only just been recommended to buy an amd from a forum and I have to say it’s tempting looking at this... yes the FPS on most games is lower but the reality is if you ignore counter and focus on the screen as one image rather than a split screen I can’t see any noticeable difference... but that’s me you might see a difference.
Dāvis Rieksts (1 month ago)
be gratefull for amd or end up like these ngreedia funbois paying 1000 bucks for mid level cpu thinking its top tier rare not on earth built cpu basacly alien tehnology. I suport now amd by actualy buying their products and not just talking because i dont believe that i actualy must spent 10k on pc parts just to run 60 buck game like these greedias want to
Khoi Dang (1 month ago)
What's wrong with the GPU usage on 2600x on TW 3 and BF?
Adolf Hitler (1 month ago)
Amd shit,Intel power !!!
r0arrr (1 month ago)
impressive with the 9600k's performance , with its 6cores/6threads managed to deliver higher framerates than the 2600x without hiccups and stuttering while recording+gaming. just wow !
Jan M (1 month ago)
The intel have 10% more fps, but ryzen is 70 Euro cheaper than the intel... and a oc board is likewise cheaper...
Comp Wiz2007 (1 month ago)
9600k is a great CPU, got it on sale and i'm more than happy with it, sold my 8600k to a friend that has a motherboard that didn't have the updated bios to run the 9600k but hadn't bought the CPU yet, so I sold him my 2 week old 8600k, then headed over to microcenter and snagged the 9600k for a good deal (broke even) ..  Also got a Ryzen 2600x for a family member's build. I had the opportunity to test them head to head using the exact same ram and gpu..   Clock for clock the 9600k stayed on top no problem (gaming). Also the 9600k seems to be a rebaged 8600k but it's clocked higher and it's soldered..  Good upgrade in my opinion and when I put in under water I will see how 5 ghz does.
Rafael Barrios (1 month ago)
Do you have liquid cooling?
ZYPHER (1 month ago)
Meanwhile me on dual core.
John Connor (1 month ago)
Honestly, I would just get the 2600X. They're similar in gaming but I do a lot of multi-tasking and the extra 12 threads on the 2600X would help a lot. Plus game streaming, the 2600X pulls far ahead of the 9600K.
The Angel of Death (1 month ago)
Best match up would be i5-8600k vs ryzen 5 2600x. Or i5 9600k vs ryzen 2700x This match up is like zebra vs horse 😂 People who play only game and have nothing running in the background, intel is good for them. But when it comes to multitasking, nothing beats amd.
Tolga Balkan (1 month ago)
Oh Ryzen lots of cores and less money lets buy GTX 1070 .... 3 day later my feels i have GTX 1060 this FPS QQ ....
Joshua Marz (1 month ago)
Make a vid where 9600k and 2600x gaming while streamin pls
AmielGamingHD (1 month ago)
Intel Core i5 9600K for pure gaming while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X for all around multi-tasking ...
Patrik Miskovic (1 month ago)
Ty for video i went and buy ryzen 2600 for 140 😉. Amd wins cheap fast and only 50% usage
Charles Constantino (1 month ago)
This is 1080p right? Where intel have always the advantage. Play it in 1440p and have some applications open trust me intel will struggle on that matter.
Артем Wr (1 month ago)
Why in the case with 9600k gpu loaded 20-25% more?
myxzlik (1 month ago)
Wow the Ryzen has way more head room based on CPU% average and still gets great fps. Too many games are 4 thread maybe 8 thread CPU limited here and it shows.
Ravi Creyf (1 month ago)
In my country te 2600x is like €75 cheaper than a i5 9600k, for me it should be a 2700 vs i5 9600k they’re the same price
Andrew Osei (1 month ago)
Just got a 1600X and loving it... Shadow of the tomb raider is a new title and Intel couldn't justify it's price with that game lol. TBH I don't get Fanboys
Mr Salman (1 month ago)
Don't look at fps look at load on cpu and gpu i don't understand why ryzen did not utilize it's full potential just like intel.
laggan 91 91 (1 month ago)
Try test it on 1440p or 4k then we know it
marvelv212 (1 month ago)
Overclock that 9600k to 5ghz and see it fly.
kingtrident7 (1 month ago)
Tired of my i5's now , i actually like having all my programs and such open while gaming and swapping between without a bunch of stuttering and delay/freezing.
edgar campo (1 month ago)
compare the cpu usage
riva2003 (1 month ago)
Ryzen all the way. The little fps gap can't justify the Intel 's price. Plus, I don't own a 144hz monitor to tell the difference anyway.
Serkan Canitez (1 month ago)
@riva2003 If you'll just try that i5 and sell it after a month then yes you can't tell the difference on 144Hz but after a couple of years, you can tell the difference by benchmarking upcoming triple-A games.
riva2003 (1 month ago)
+Serkan Canitez Well, it requires a 144Hz or higher Hz monitor to tell the difference, doesn't it?
Serkan Canitez (1 month ago)
Little FPS gap... Like "40" FPS right?
Toto Wiranta (1 month ago)
Its simple If youre hardcore gamer. Choose 9600k If youre casual gamer choose Ryzen 5 2600x. If youre poor like me. Its lot of choice like ryzen 2600. I3 8100. Ryzen first gen And just stick 1060 6gb. There you have 60 fps at medium-high setting 1080p. Its enough to me for PUBG Dota2 Warframe Assassin's Creed Origin. And Ark Survival Evolved.
Give Me A Smile (2 months ago)
So many jewtel shills in here.
Jawrshe (2 months ago)
$250 for that 9600k? You're $50 away from the i7 8700 (non k) which has 12 threads. Ryzen only makes sense for less than <144hz gaming.
Guilherme Souza (2 months ago)
Why AMD CPUs can't force VGA to give more performance? Is that something about the devs that optmize games for certain brand? Or maybe something related to the Bios? Or even the motherboard, or the processor building itself? 🤔 Could we have some improvement from AMD in the future, for those who chose their APU/CPUs?
Abias Masud (2 months ago)
Intel is bit freezing
Nikola Stankovic (2 months ago)
Ryzen 2000 sucks , intel 9000 suck hard too.. Waiting for ryzen 3000 series and ipc increase... With that core numbers ofc :)))
Mr. Socrates (2 months ago)
144 hz -> intel 60 hz -> amd
Dragos 2.1 (2 months ago)
Yo guys should i get i3 8100 and 1060 6gb OC or r5 2600 and 1060 6gb OC
Phước 91 (2 months ago)
Test with game pubg
AmpedUpTech (2 months ago)
Guys notice one thing in the graphs. In whichever game 2600x was getting defeated, in that game the GPU wasn't getting utilized properly. Notice the graph. In whichever game the GPU was getting utilised properly, the 2600x was performing at par. I don't know why in some games that is an anomaly for Ryzen systems. Just a heads up, I am not talking about CPU utilisation (ofcourse CPU utilisation on 2600x would be less as it has 12 threads), I am talking about GPU utilisation. I guess that is the sole reason why Ryzen 2600x performed badly in some games.
Customhorror (2 months ago)
I tried to explain that.. so some games are CPU craving.. and some games are GPU craving. So the games where they are both on par, you will probably see the GPU near 100 workload.. 90'ish on both platforms.. the game is so graphically demanding, that it's pushing the GPU to almost 100 percent on both CPU's. So a faster CPU wont give more frames. The GPU is already working it's ass off. A simple way to depict how graphics is rendered: Cpu prepares frames for the GPU before the GPU renders them. So if the GPU has room for rendring, meaning its not already working its ass off, the faster cpu will make it work harder. But if the GPU is already at full load, a faster cpu dosn't matter, cuz it has to wait for the GPU anyway.
Customhorror (2 months ago)
AmpedUpTech basically the two cpus compete to see if they can make the GPU reach 100 percent workload. If they can’t, the gpu still has some more power to spit even more frames out. And a faster cpu could deliver that. But sure there will also be games optimized better for Ryzen.
Customhorror (2 months ago)
AmpedUpTech those games were probably more GPU dependent, therefore both cpus seem to be just as fast as they both are fast enough to reach the gpus limit. At least that’s the case in the gpu was running at 100.
AmpedUpTech (2 months ago)
+Customhorror If that's the case then why in some games it was performing at par as compared to 9600k? I believe some games are just not optimised for AMD Zen architecture.
Customhorror (2 months ago)
AmpedUpTech it’s because the cpu is the bottleneck, the gpu could still render more frames if the cpu was faster.
FellTheSky (2 months ago)
wow its like 25% faster in fall out
세상의끝 (2 months ago)
9600k more expensive and need to purchase cooler.
JetStream TV (2 months ago)
People who are commenting AMD sucks: The Ryzen is on avg getting less FPS, yes, but you’re not looking at the CPU %. On avg the Ryzen is using HALF the CPU power as the Intel. Think about that. If you have any plans on running any other software in the background (like streaming with OBS) then the Intel will struggle with already using 90% of its power with just the game. Your opinion is irrelevant unless you actually know what you’re talking about. Both of these CPU’s are good. The type of CPU you need depends on what you’re going to be doing. In general, the Ryzen is a much better value in terms of performance per dollar. Just do your research before deciding which one you think will be best for you.
Cvidz (17 days ago)
ITSATRAP ! My valid argument is that you’re a dumbass🤷‍♂️
ITSATRAP ! (17 days ago)
+Cvidz You need a valid argument? 😂👍
Cvidz (17 days ago)
ITSATRAP ! Looks like we got a parrot with no valid argument 🤷‍♂️ keep rocking on that potato of yours.
ITSATRAP ! (17 days ago)
+Cvidz Retards like you still buys intel? 😂👍
Cvidz (18 days ago)
ITSATRAP ! Retards like you still like 4gz and under? 😂👍
Wade Mercer (2 months ago)
*PENTIUM G5600 Vs I3 8100*
FaiYaZZ vLoGs (2 months ago)
Oc the 2600x to 4.2 and use 3200 mem , performance will be better about 15%
Romeo Zero (2 months ago)
For general public - The TRUE benefits of multithreading rendering in games will come approx next in 2 years or so.The more the cores and threads in CPU the more variable game engines can compute compilation codes with multiple processes for physics and PostProcess fx work for 60+ fps.Mark this, for future plans. (I'm writing this as game engine tester and user.) The fact - you all just would sit on single core CPU if it was not true.
Mystic シ (2 months ago)
I hate those type of people who think the CPU who has better frame rate wins, when basically it depends on the percent and temperature
sTryKer (2 months ago)
I just realised something... Why tf is that i5 322€ in my country ? The Ryzen 5 2600x is 172€ lol.
Definitely not Boosted (1 month ago)
+futmut1000 also +70 dollars for Intel price because you will need a cooler right? Yeah but intel decided not to include one and the temps of the 9 gen are stupidly high where it gets to the point that only a buff cooler can cool it down to atleast 60º. Oh and forgot to mention the amazing extra for the full intel experience, you have to buy a +100 board so you can UnLoCk the the amazing overclock to atleast have a 50+ fps margin of a 160$ CPU. Well atleast it will be able to do multitask like a boss... Oven and PC at the same time super nice
Definitely not Boosted (1 month ago)
+futmut1000 there is a thing called market share and Intel is getting fuckd in every way possible by amd, idk if there is that many people who will spend 100$ per 20fps and a useless CPU after 1 year
futmut1000 (2 months ago)
There is a shortage for Intel Cpu's right now, also this Cpu is new and just came out...Dont forget that Intel is faster and will not sell their Cpu's same price as the slower Amd does, that wouldnt make sense...
Bliț (2 months ago)
Ryzen is definitely a better choice
Pvp wm (2 months ago)
This CPU is just getting worst.
Maniu Maniek (2 months ago)
Trashzen XD
DEϟTRUCTION (2 months ago)
All kids that means that the i5 is better: Don't look only at the fps - look at the cpu usage.
Aluoire _ (2 months ago)
How can u got 50°c in Odyssey i got 70 with the 9600k on Water cooling 240 ._.
Bruno George Moraes (2 months ago)
So if clock matched the Ryzen would be higher than Intel!!! Of course at these clocks, Intel gives better fps and gpu utilization.
Kwasicz (2 months ago)
nothing new, amd still sucks ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Vovical (6 hours ago)
I'm buying an i5 and I still think this comment is incredibly ignorant
Fasieh Khan (8 days ago)
AMD is $150 cheaper, 45% cpu usage vs 85%-100% usage, AMD has lower temps, and is better for workstation related tasks, and would perform even closer in 1440p. AMD wins
Christian Confettura (23 days ago)
Nooooooob you suck <3 AMD @kwasucks
dubol07 (1 month ago)
+Lucas Sjögren No it doesn't cost 120 more dollars! You probably are referring to Ryzen 2600 and not the 2600x that is being used in this comparison.
Shronk 4K (1 month ago)
+Kwasicz oooof ignorant PC noob
Dee Ma (2 months ago)
В высочайшем разрешении разность будет мала, а стоимость и загрузка проца решают!
Max Payne (2 months ago)
365$ blue VS 250$ Red in Russia
Mr. Cool (2 months ago)
Ryzen very good
Trzstan (2 months ago)
Both of them get over 150FPS, for video editing, Ryzen. If you want those extra frames that don't make a difference, even when running a 144hz monitor. Ryzen is a good choice. Saves some money, and you get great editing performance. Keep in mind, I'm not saying that FPS doesn't matter. I'm just pointing out the fact that when you are getting over the refresh rate of your monitor, games will not become smoother than that. Unless you have a 240hz monitor.
[FTU] Mike (2 months ago)
Райзен топ и по фпс стоимость производитель и не достаточно процентов в цп
shadow seven (2 months ago)
My channel is about benchmarking the gtx 1050 with the 750ti too, any one wanna help each other sub to me i'll sub back instantly , just like this comment and say done
๖NỒI一KHÁNHッ (2 months ago)
RTX 2080 TI beast
Spatosky (2 months ago)
So Intel won in performance but not price? That's what I see in the comments at least. Now you ryzen and Intel fanboys... DEBATE
redux (2 months ago)
Can some explain why the hell you would spend more on the 9600k if you only have 60hz or 120hz it obviously better ipc on intel but ther both mostly above 120 and 2600x is better multitasker I just wouldn’t see any gain at all with the 9600k actually would be worse for multitasking
Olaf (2 months ago)
AMD Ryzen the poor people CPU.. low and slow ;)
Khoi Dang (2 months ago)
Yeah, just check out the news, looks like Intel will gonna increase their CPU price again
Romeo Zero (2 months ago)
+Olaf AMD is actually pushing the progress with multitasking and HBM. While others are stagnant corporations with phobia who just want monopoly on prices.
Olaf (2 months ago)
+XxViciousxX Yes, that is correct. AMD...thanks for the pressure
XxViciousxX (2 months ago)
HMMM interesting I have a Ryzen CPU yet am not poor. Dont like supporting Intel right now. Intel has been getting very lazy lately. If not for AMD Intel you still sell you $340 quad cores...
Stoneloan (2 months ago)
30fps difference *but look at the cpz usage* *amd is more mutli purpose* *this comparison is not fair* *amd is cheaper* *me me me me me amd amd amd* Intel is supreme, stfu Don't say it's better its more budget friendly I'm the most poor mofo out there and still I bought the I5-8600k Intel supreme boys
Tago King (2 months ago)
It's simple Intel for Mans and ryzen for poor kids
Clorox Bleach (2 months ago)
lol speak englesh loser
Guilherme Souza (2 months ago)
men* please, not mans, man... oh god... '-'
DEϟTRUCTION (2 months ago)
Why should i pay 200$ more for the same processor and more CPU USAGE, are you serious?
Mobarak Jama (2 months ago)
Tago king All hail the kids that slayed the "Mans" :D
Mystic シ (2 months ago)
you probably can't even afford intel.
Mayank Singh (2 months ago)
Bro I don't know perhaps it's just a coincidence or something but I got exactly the same specs as of your pc
Mayank Singh (2 months ago)
I got the ryzen and the gigabyte x470 motherboard
d00m Slay3r_RT (2 months ago)
2600X at default clocks is weak, even the 8400 can beat it.
miguel angel tabares (2 months ago)
I've always been an amd fan but intel has better fps but uses too much its processor consumes more memory and its heating is higher so I'm left with amd so this below with the fps and requires less the graphics card
Ethan Miller (2 months ago)
See what CEO of a these days buzz coin says how to earn more if you have Core i5 or Ryzen. By mining, when you are not playing games. https://coinedtimes.com/user-friendly-mining-app-turning-everyday-computers-into-miners/#utm_source=dnk&utm_medium=dank&utm_campaign=Mine%20Dnk
misterPAINMAKER (2 months ago)
Plz show all cores
Хикка (2 months ago)
*Test Intel core 2 duo vs i9 9900K* *Please*
twin frozer (11 days ago)
FX8300 VS 9700K
Iron Joe (15 days ago)
hmm, Micro Center has 2600x for $199.99 and 9600K for $229.99 not sure what to get, I can get 3600MHZ DDR4 for intel for $139 and AMD Ryzen approved DDR4 3200MHZ for $205 cant make up my mind, I like them both.
+Gamer KilladiYT omg JESUS
Your Local Wallstreet (1 month ago)
Tyler Dickson (2 months ago)
Gabrielle Dela Cruz (2 months ago)
Wow. Good FPS, I'm satisfied with only 50 and above.
Subhajit Chatterjee (2 months ago)
Add HT to the 9600K and nothing, Absolutely nothing from ryzen can beat it in gaming.....even in cpu heavy titles......but i guess intel is just dumb😒😒😒
S. (2 months ago)
Even without ht Intel comes out on top.
Subhajit Chatterjee (2 months ago)
Thats honestly an overkill for just gaming (no game uses 16 threads) and much more expensive cpu than the 9600K...But my point is if AMD can include SMT to its ryzen 5 processors which competes directly with intel's i5 series of processors than i dont get why cant intel include HT in its i5 lineup😫
S. (2 months ago)
Just buy the 9900k then.
MarsuveezBlack (2 months ago)
Shame. We all hope AMD would save us.
Resort (2 months ago)
I was waiting for this
Resort (2 months ago)
Wait nvm I’m waiting for the 2700x
123OGNIAN (2 months ago)
Obviously nvidia hating amd.In all videos i see a exact 15% more gpu ussage with a intel cpu than a equal or better amd..Its cripled drivers for the hardware selling games so that people can choose intel.At least at 2k this dissapears.
2600 or 1700? With gtx1070

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.